VERIFIED ISO/IEC 27001 Certified | ISO 9001 Certified | DPDP Compliant | RBI Compliant Platform
Banking Sector · Retail NPAs

Case Study 06: Notice-Triggered Collection Calling for Legal- Recovery at a NBFC

₹120+ Cr Recovered
EXECUTIVE IMPACT SUMMARY

Challenge

Notices and collection calling ran on separate, fixed calendars with no shared visibility into notice delivery or read status, causing premature or delayed calling and no differentiation by notice outcome.

ClearDu Solution

ClearDu integrated Notifi X and Collexifi so that legal-stage notice outcomes - delivered, read, unpaid, undelivered, or disputed - directly trigger and prioritize collection calling, with call outcomes fed back into the same account timeline.

Key Results

• 34% faster notice-to-call conversion • 42% higher recovery from notice-linked calling • 100% compliant call-timing relative to notice service • 21% fewer redundant calls to resolved accounts

CLIENT PROFILE

A NBFC managing a portfolio of legal-stage and pre-legal delinquent accounts (61+ DPD and NPA) that require formal notice issuance ahead of further recovery escalation, across a pan-India branch network.

BUSINESS CONTEXT

Legal-stage recovery accounts must be issued a formal notice, and given a defined response window, before further collection escalation is appropriate – both as a contractual discipline and to keep the account’s recovery action legally sound.

The NBFC previously ran notice dispatch and collection calling as two disconnected activities: notices were issued by an operations team on a fixed schedule, while calling teams worked a separate, calendar-driven cadence with no visibility into whether a given borrower’s notice had actually been delivered, read, or ignored.

CHALLENGE

  • Calling teams had no visibility into notice delivery or read status, so some borrowers were called before their notice was even confirmed delivered, while others who had clearly ignored a delivered notice went uncalled for extended periods.
  • There was no differentiated calling strategy based on notice outcome – a borrower who had read the notice and not responded was worked identically to one whose notice had bounced back undelivered.
  • Undelivered notices were not systematically routed for address verification before the account moved to calling, resulting in repeated contact attempts on outdated details.
  • The disconnect between notice status and calling cadence created both a compliance risk – calling before a notice was legally deemed served – and a missed opportunity to prioritize the borrowers most likely to convert, those who had engaged with the notice but not yet paid.

CLEARDU PLATFORM IMPLEMENTED

Primary platform: Notifi X, integrated with Collexifi

Notifi X was implemented as the anchor for legal-stage notice generation, dispatch, and delivery-status capture, integrated with Collexifi so that collection calling is triggered and prioritized directly by each account’s notice outcome rather than running on an independent calendar.

DETAILED SOFTWARE IMPLEMENTATION

  • Legal-stage notice templates were configured in Notifi X for formal demand and legal notices, with defined response-window timelines attached to each notice type.
  • Notices were dispatched across digital and physical channels as applicable, with delivery, read, and acknowledgement status captured centrally for every notice issued.
  • Notice-outcome triggers were configured to route accounts automatically: “delivered, no response after the defined window” queued the account for priority calling; “undelivered” routed the account to an address-verification workflow before any call attempt; “borrower query or dispute raised” escalated the account to a specialized resolution team instead of standard calling.
  • Collexifi calling campaigns were configured to begin only once a notice was confirmed served within its defined response window, preventing premature contact and prioritizing accounts showing a “read, unpaid” signal for the earliest calling slots.
  • Call outcomes – Promise-to-Pay, dispute, refusal, or resolution – were fed back into the same account record in Notifi X, so any subsequent notice reflects the latest call outcome rather than issuing automatically regardless of recent contact.
  • A consolidated dashboard was built for legal and collection teams showing the notice-to-call funnel by DPD bucket and notice outcome.

PROCESS TRANSFORMATION

Before: Before integration, notices and collection calling ran on separate, fixed calendars with no shared visibility, resulting in both premature and delayed contact and no differentiation by notice outcome.

After: After implementation, calling begins only once a notice is confirmed served, is prioritized by real engagement signals such as “delivered, unpaid,” and call outcomes are recorded back into the same account timeline that tracks notice history.

  • Collection managers can see, for any account, whether calling is appropriate yet and why it was triggered.
  • Tele-calling teams work a prioritized queue driven by actual notice engagement rather than a blanket schedule.
  • Legal and compliance teams have assurance that calling activity is sequenced correctly relative to notice service.

PLATFORM CAPABILITIES USED

  • Legal-stage notice generation with defined response-window triggers
  • Delivery, read, and acknowledgement status tracking
  • Notice-outcome-based call triggers
  • Address-verification routing for undelivered notices
  • Promise-to-Pay capture on calling outcomes
  • Escalation management for disputes and queries
  • Consolidated notice-and-call account timeline
  • Compliance-ready audit trail

KEY RESULTS

  • 34% faster movement from notice dispatch to first productive call among “delivered, unpaid” accounts
  • 22% improvement in recovery from notice-linked calling campaigns
  • 100% of calling activity sequenced to begin only after a notice’s defined response window, removing premature-contact risk
  • 19% reduction in redundant calling to accounts already resolved through notice-driven payment
  • 27% reduction in repeat contact attempts on undelivered notices, aided by automated address-verification routing

IMPLEMENTATION CONSIDERATIONS AND CONTROLS

  • Response-window timelines were configured per notice type in line with the NBFC’s contractual and internal legal-recovery policy.
  • Calling was gated to begin only after a notice was confirmed served, avoiding contact ahead of the appropriate stage.
  • Disputes and borrower queries raised on a notice were routed to a specialized resolution team rather than the standard calling queue.
  • Undelivered notices were held from calling until address verification was completed, reducing wasted contact attempts.
  • The combined notice-and-call account timeline was maintained as a single, audit-ready record for legal review.

CONCLUSION

By linking Notifi X’s notice delivery intelligence directly to Collexifi’s calling workflow, the NBFC replaced two disconnected, calendar-driven processes with a single, outcome-driven legal recovery workflow. Calling now begins at the right time, is prioritized toward borrowers most likely to convert, and produces a consolidated record connecting every notice to its resulting call – improving both recovery performance and the defensibility of the institution’s legal-recovery process.


Are you looking to modernize your FinTech & Debt Resolution operations?

Schedule a customized platform walkthrough with ClearDu enterprise specialists.

Contact Us
BUILT FOR MODERN FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS

Ready to Upgrade Your Debt Recovery Efficiency?

Schedule a live walkthrough with our fintech execution specialists and discover how Collexifi, Notifi X, SARFAESI 360, and VoiceBot Solutions can automate your debt recovery with zero compliance risk.

Talk to Specialist